Discussão:Analogia Israel-Apartheid

O conteúdo da página não é suportado noutras línguas.
Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.

Esta página foi escrito por alguem preconceituoso e que não conhece os fatos tanto da politica israelense quanto da realidade palestina na região. o comentário precedente deveria ter sido assinado por Dovb (discussão • contrib.)

Não-enciclopédico[editar código-fonte]

Gostaria de entender qual é o sentido deste verbete, que não me parece nem um pouco adequado e enciclopédico, sendo apenas um arrazoado de opiniões soltas. Victor Grinbaum (discussão) 17h15min de 13 de janeiro de 2011 (UTC)[responder]

do artigo em inglês[editar código-fonte]

Dever ser incluido também o seguinte trecho do panfl..., quero dizer "artigo" em inglês:

Criticism by Arab citizens of Israel

In the Durban Review Conference of 2009, the Israeli-Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh criticized Arab Knesset members for supporting extremism and calling Israel a "state of apartheid" rather than fighting for the rights of Arab citizens of Israel.


And then they come here to tell us that Israel is a state of apartheid? Excuse me. What kind of hypocrisy is this? What then are you doing in the Knesset? If you are living in an apartheid system, why were you allowed, as an Arab, to run in the election? What are you talking about? We do have problems as Arabs with the establishment here. But to come and say that Israel is an apartheid state is a big exaggeration. I am not here to defend Israel, but I think that Knesset members like this gentleman are doing huge damage to the cause of Israeli Arabs. I want to see the Knesset member sitting in the Knesset, in Jerusalem, and fighting for the rights of Arabs over there.[272]

He continued by stating, "Israel is a wonderful place to live and we are happy to be there. Israel is a free and open country. If I were given the choice, I would rather live in Israel as a second class citizen than as a first class citizen in Cairo, Gaza, Amman or Ramallah."[272][273][274]

Dr. Mohammed Wattad, an Arab citizen of Israel and a member of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East, criticized the analogy in a 2010 interview, saying:


“As an Israeli citizen, I belong to a political entity... I have no other home than the State of Israel. I am a proud Israeli citizen but that doesn’t mean I can’t criticize it... At the same time I am a proud Arab national ... “Is there discrimination in Israel? Yes — there is discrimination against women, elderly, Arabs, Russian Jews, Christians,... But the same goes for Canada. Is it good — No? But it means we have to deal with the problem from within.... The existence of discrimination in a state does not mean it is an apartheid state...There is a big difference between apartheid and discrimination,” “In an apartheid regime, there is no possibility of judicial review, because the judges are appointed by the regime and all serve one ideology. This is not the case in Israel ... There is a very strong, independent Supreme Court in Israel. In an apartheid regime [unlike in Israel] there is no place to go to argue against the government,”