Usuário:Tuga1143/Testes3

Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.

Fliegerführer Atlantik (em português: Comando de Aviação do Atlântico) foi um comando da Luftwaffe durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial que se dedicou à realização de operações no teatro de guerra da Batalha do Atlântico.

No começo da Segunda Guerra Mundial, em Setembro de 1939, a Luftwaffe era uma força aérea eficaz no cumprimento das suas missões, e contribuiu substancialmente para o sucesso das campanhas da Wehrmacht. Entre as duas guerras mundiais o alto comando militar alemão não realizou esforços para desenvolver a aviação naval. Assim, existia uma falta de aeronaves navais com as capacidades necessárias para varrer os mares em conjunto com a Kriegsmarine, tanto em missões de patrulha, abastecimento ou ataque contra embarcações aliadas. Em 1940, a Wehrmacht ocupava uma boa parte da Europa Ocidental e da Escandinávia. A Kriegsmarine e o seu comandante-em-chefe Erich Raeder viam isto como uma oportunidade para destruir as comunicações marítimas do Reino Unido, o último inimigo capaz de rivalizar contra os alemães. Eventualmente, depois de alguma disputa, a Kriegsmarine recebeu um comando de aviação denominado Fliegerführer Atlantik, que realizaria missões de interdição e reconhecimento.

Em Fevereiro de 1941, o Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (OKL) recebeu uma ordem de Adolf Hitler para formar um comando de aviação naval para apoiar as operações dos submarinos da Kriegsmarine na Batalha do Atlântico.[1] Embora relutante, o comandante-em-chefe da Luftwaffe, Hermann Göring, concordou com a formação de um comando de aviação especializado em operações navais que permaneceria sob o controlo operacional da Luftwaffe. Este comando ficou subordinado à Luftflotte 3, comandada então por Hugo Sperrle.[1] O comando tinha jurisdição sob todas as operações da Luftwaffe no Atlântico e apoiava os ataques da marinha contra embarcações aliadas no Oceano Atlântico, no Canal da Mancha e no Mar da Irlanda. O primeiro comandante deste comando foi Martin Harlinghausen.

O comando empenhou-se em várias operações e alcançou um sucesso considerável em 1941, aumentando as baixas dos comboios marítimos britânicos. O primeiro-ministro Winston Churchill referiu-se então ao Fliegerführer Atlantik e à sua principal arma de guerra, o Focke-Wulf Fw 200, como "o flagelo do Atlântico". Ainda assim, no final do ano de 1941 as contra-medidas aliadas criavam um ambiente cada vez mais difícil para as aeronaves de longo-alcance alemãs. As batalhas no Atlântico intensificaram-se em 1942 e em 1943 o comando solicitou incessantemente mais aeronaves e tripulações. Completamente envolvida em outras operações e em diversas frentes de guerra, a Luftwaffe não se podia dar ao luxo de enviar recursos para operações no Atlântico.

Por volta de 1944 o Fliegerführer Atlantik agiu meramente como uma força de protecção aérea para os submarinos no Golfo da Biscaia, contra o seu inimigo operacional, o Comando Costeiro da RAF. Por volta de Agosto de 1944 o Fliegerführer Atlantik e os submarinos já havia deixado de ser uma força eficaz. As aeronaves navais alemãs ainda realizaram alguns ataques aquando da Invasão da Normandia, contudo em Setembro o comando foi dissolvido, quando a frente alemã em França colapsou.

Doutrina aeronaval[editar | editar código-fonte]

Durante a Primeira Guerra Mundial a Marinha Imperial Alemã (em alemão: Kaiserliche Marine) conduziu várias operações aéreas bem sucedidas no Mar do Norte. O Corpo Aeronaval Alemão (em alemão: Marinefliegerkorps) conseguiu estabelecer superioridade aérea e foi capaz de realizar com eficácia operações anti-navio. Apesar de combater com sucesso e com bravura durante a guerra, ao contrário do Exército Imperial Alemão, o corpo aeronaval não foi capaz de alcançar qualquer vitória decisiva. O exército por outro lado conseguia apontar para sucessos decisivos longínquos como os alcançados durante as Guerras Napoleónicas, e mantinha uma tradição de aprender com os erros do passado. Quando a Reichsmarine foi instituída pelo governo da República de Weimar, os oficiais navais tinham consciência do seu contributo durante a guerra e da sua posição como o ramo armado menos experiente. Tudo isto contribuiu para a relutância de se proceder a uma exame das operações aeronavais. Em 1921 a Reichsmarine possuía apenas 15 pilotos.[2]

Rivalidades entre os vários ramos armados da Alemanha também contribuíram para o atraso no desenvolvimento da doutrina aeronaval alemã. A própria marinha recusava-se a cooperar com o exército relativamente em assuntos aéreos. Os oficiais da antiga Luftstreikräfte, agora no exército, sabiam que o pessoal da marinha havia sido o principal opositor para a construção de um ramo aéreo independente. Por outro lado, a marinha ainda guardava ressentimento pela Luftstreikräfte por ter controlado a produção e o desenvolvimento de aeronaves durante a guerra. O comandante-em-chefe da marinha, o Almirante Hans Zenker, também mantinha uma certa desconfiança para com a atitude do Reichtag de por de lado a própria marinha e os seus pedidos operacionais. Zenker acreditava que se a marinha cooperasse demasiado com o exército, que seria provável que a o exército passasse a mandar na marinha e esta deixasse de ser um ramo independente.[2]

A marinha alemã detinha um pequeno programa aeronaval. Companhias aeronauticas como a Heinkel e a Dornier Flugzeugwerke eram contratadas para desenvolver e produzir hidroaviões e outras aeronaves navais. O Heinkel He 1 de Ernst Heinkel e o Dornier Wal de Claude Dornier eram dois dos mais eficientes hidroaviões dos anos 20. Uma vantagem que a marinha tinha em relação ao exército era o facto de ter permissão de possuir uma força antiaérea; assim, a marinha podia usar aeronaves para reboque e para exercícios que lhes permitia possuir um programa aeronáutico muito maior e desenvolvido do que o exército. Assim, Zenker considerava ser desnecessário juntar-te ao exército no desenvolvimento clandestino de programas aeronáuticos na União Soviética. No começo da década de 20, a marinha gastava um sexto do que o exército gastava com a aviação.[2]

O Tratado de Versalhes proibia a maior parte dos aspectos em torno do desenvolvimento aeronáutico na Alemanha. Contudo, o tratado não proibia os exercícios navais com aeronaves. Esta lacuna no tratado permitia o desenvolvimento de aeronaves dentro da esfera de influência naval. Mais tarde, o Tratado de Paris de 1926 reafirmou os termos do tratado de Versalhes mas deixava de lado a questão da defesa aérea. Assim, a Alemanha tinha permissão para desenvolver um sistema de defesa aérea para proteger o país de uma agressão aérea. Embora isto não significasse uma luz verde para o desenvolvimento de aeronaves navais, por volta de 1927 os alemães iniciavam um secreto programa de desenvolvimento e treino em Warnemuende. Uma Secção Aérea Costeira foi criada e mascarada como se fosse uma empresa privada. No dia 1 de Setembro de 1929, a secção foi dissolvida em prol de contractos com firmas privadas. A marinha começou a contratar aeronaves para exercícios aeronavais à empresa Luftdienst G.m.b.H, que cobrava à marinha 453 RM por hora por um contrato de 3000 horas de voo por ano. Por volta de 31 de Janeiro de 1931 cadetes navais começaram a juntar-se à marinha e os primeiros regulamentos sobre a cooperação entre as unidades aéreas e aeronavais foram publicados. No começo dos anos 30, a força aeronaval da marinha estava criada.[3]

Göring e Raeder[editar | editar código-fonte]

Adolf Hitler (left) with Hermann Göring, 16 March 1938.

Quando Adolf Hitler e o partido nacional-socialista tomaram o poder em 1933, as bases lançadas pela marinha e pelos governos da Republica de Weimar sofreram um revés. Hitler nomeou Hermann Göring, um alto dirigente nazi, aliado pessoal de Hitler, ás da aviação com 22 vitórias aéreas durante a Primeira Guerra Mundial e recipiente da Pour le Mérite, como o Comissário Nacional para a Aviação, com o antigo director da Deutsche Lufy Hansa Erhard Milch como vice. Em Abril de 1933 o Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM, em português: Ministério da Aviação do Reich) foi criado e encabeçado por Göring. Mais tarde, foi criado no papel um ramo aéreo independente dos outros ramos armados, a Luftwaffe, e Göring defendia de forma inflexível que toda a aviação militar deveria ficar subordinada à Luftwaffe, que dois anos mais tarde seria formada de facto.[4]

A lógica de Göring em ter uma um ramo aéreo independente era uma decisão militar prudente, contudo o futuro Reichsmarschall via a nova Luftwaffe como uma base do seu poder pessoal na Alemanha Nazi, além claro de a ver como uma arma de guerra crucial e, consequentemente, assumia-se totalmente inflexível em partilhar o poder aéreo com a marinha.[5] A sua visão colocava-o em conflito direcção com o Großadmiral Erich Raeder, comandante-em-chefe da marinha. Göring desdenhava a marinha e o seu comandante.[4] Aos olhos de Göring, tanto Raeder como a marinha representavam parte da burguesia na sociedade alemã que o nacional-socialismo havia jurado eliminar.[6] Durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial, esta rivalidade evoluiria em desentendimentos cada vez mais hostis.[7]

Raeder não se opunha à independência de um ramo aéreo alemão, contudo acreditava que uma força aeronaval deveria ficar sob o controlo da marinha. Se a recém-criada Kriegsmarine, a sucessora da Reichsmarine, deveria constituir-se como uma arma de guerra eficaz, esta deveria ter uma força aeronaval sob o seu controlo. A discussão sobre o controlo da aviação naval terminaram temporariamente em 1937 quando o Ministério da Defesa (em alemão: Reichswehrministerium) emitiu um comunicado no qual declarava que a aviação naval ficaria sob o controlo da Luftwaffe mas que unidades aeronáuticas especializadas ficariam sob o controlo operacional da Kriegsmarine.[8]

No dia 4 de Fevereiro de 1937 Göring convidou Raeder para uma conferência privada, a qual Raeder aceitou. Na conferência, que se deu no dia 11 de Março, Raeder entregou a Göring um memorando no qual pedia que a aviação naval fosse destacada, permanentemente, para a marinha, visto que esta estava na melhor posição para saber quais as necessidades operacional capazes de serem colmatadas pela aviação naval. O resultado desta conferência e os conflitos entre os dois homens foram levados até ao Ministério da Defesa. O Supremo Comandante Werner von Blomberg ordenou que as unidades aeronauticas que apoiavam as operações navais ficariam sob o domínio da Luftwaffe mas que, no entendo, ficariam sob o controlo da Kriegsmarine. Esta decisão não resolveu a questão sobre quem ficaria responsável pelas operações aéreas no mar. Depois de a Kriegsmarine se ter queixado da ausência de uma resolução, no dia 10 de Março uma nova conferência foi organizada para o dia 1 de Abril com Albert Kesselring, Chefe do Alto Comando da Luftwaffe e Göring. Mais tarde, outra conferência foi convocada no dia 10 de Maio, contudo o resultado era sempre o mesmo. Göring atacava as visões de Blomberg e Raeder e defendia que as unidades aéreas da Luftwaffe deveriam ficar à disposição da marinha apenas em operações muito específicas. Talvez exasperado e derrotado, Raeder emitiu um comunicado no qual declarava que a marinha havia decidido que o pedido de comando da marinha sob todas as unidades aeronáuticas não seria mais expressada;[9] Raeder sabia que Göring não aceitava que a marinha devesse ter o controlo das unidades aeronavais, e que provavelmente isso nunca iria acontecer.[8]

O fim da força aeronaval[editar | editar código-fonte]

O conflito entre a Kriegsmarine e a Luftwaffe continuou ao longo de 1937 e 1938. Göring não rejeitava abertamente os pedidos da marinha, nem negava a importância de um poder aeronaval em operações de guerra marítima, o que lhe dava espaço para discussões. Göring expressava sempre vontade em cooperar, mas apenas no sentido em que a Luftwaffe pudesse tirar proveito das sugestões e da pesquisa da marinha. Ele ordenou o desmembramento de todas as actividades e organizações aeronavais. Assim, a posição da marinha tornou-se mais fraca. Göring havia sido nomeado por Hitler como o chefe do Plano de Quatro Anos e, nesta posição, Göring podia decidir sobre todas as políticas relativamente à distribuição de recursos aeronáuticos. Sob estas circunstâncias Raeder e a marinha não puderam fazer nada senão aceitar que uma força aeronaval sob o comando da marinha não se tornaria numa realidade. A confirmação final sobre como as forças marítimas e aeronáuticas iriam interagir foi decidida numa conferência no dia 27 de Fevereiro de 1939 e foi ratificada por um memorando criado por Karl Bodenschatz (adjunto de Göring) e assinado por Göring e Raeder. Ficava agora estipulado que a Luftwaffe permaneceria com o controlo total das unidades aeronavais, e que as operações aeronavais seriam geridas por um oficial da Luftwaffe destacado à Kriegsmarine.[10]

O retrocesso na aviação naval continuou independentemente do seu potencial. Durante a Guerra Civil Espanhola as aeronaves alemãs—principalmente o Heinkel He 59 e o Heinkel He 60—afundaram 144 embarcações das 554 perdidas pelas forças republicanas e desempenharam um papel muito importante na vitória do general Francisco Franco. Pouco tempo antes da queda de Barcelona em 1939, por exemplo, estas aeronaves afundaram 30 embarcações e danificaram muitas mais no porto marítimo.[11] Apesar do sucesso das operações anti-navio realizadas pelas aeronaves alemãs, a aviação naval continuou a não ocupar um lugar importante na Luftwaffe. À semelhança das políticas nigligentes do Almirante Zenker, a doutrina aeronáutica durante o mandato do General Walter Wever (1933 - 1936) deixou os assuntos aeronavais em quarto lugar na sua lista de prioridades na obra Condução da Guerra Aérea de 1935. Mesmo assim, uma boa parte do progresso realizado na aviação naval partiu da iniciativa da própria Luftwaffe. Apesar da posição dos altos dirigentes da Luftwaffe, vários oficiais não seguiram pela mesma linha de pensamento e fizeram os possíveis para dar importância à aviação naval. O General Hellmuth Felmy, comandante da Luftflotte 2, montou um corpo especializado em aeronaves navais sob o comando de Hans Geisler—um aviador naval e antigo marinheiro. Felmy foi responsável pela realização de várias operações aeronavais. Mais tarde, Joachim Coeler foi nomeado inspector da aviação naval. Coeler, Geisler e outros aviadores navais foram responsáveis pelo desenvolvimento de torpedos lançados por aeronaves e minas navais que se revelaram úteis durante os anos de guerra. Contudo, todas as tentativas de construir um ramo aeronaval foram empatadas pelo comandante-em-chefe da Luftwaffe, Hermann Göring.[12]

Segunda Guerra Mundial[editar | editar código-fonte]

No dia 1 de Setembro de 1939 a Wehrmacht invadiu a Polónia, e três dias mais tarde a França e o Reino Unido declararam guerra à Alemanha Nazi, dando assim início à Segunda Guerra Mundial. À Kriegsmarine foi desde logo atribuída uma série de operações contra a Marinha Real Britânica no Mar do Norte. O facto de as operações aeronavais estarem atrasadas no tempo e na eficácia relativamente às operações aeronáuticas em terra foi aproveitado por Raeder no dia 23 de Outubro de 1939 para chamar à atenção de Hitler; Raeder pediu uma maior cooperação e operações conjuntas entre o ramo naval e o ramo aéreo. No dia 30 de Outubro de 1939 o Grupo Naval Ocidental sob o comando do Almirante Alfred Saalwächter submeteu um memorando para o alto comando da Kriegsmarine. Neste memorando, Saalwächter frisou que as forças à sua disposição eram demasiado fracas para suportar as operações aéreas ao longo de vastas distância, e que as operações aéreas exigidas até então estavam a deixar exaustas a pequenas forças à sua disposição, deixando-as incapazes de realizar com rigor as longas operações aéreas. Esta situação, observou ele, tornava impossível reconhecer as actividades inimigas ou atacar o inimigo mesmo em condições climatéricas favoráveis. Saalwächter também se queixou do facto de as aeronaves disponíveis, o Dornier Do 18 e o Heinkel He 115 estarem disponíveis em números muito baixos e de as baixas sofridas serem maiores que a reposição das aeronaves. Ele solicitou 378 aeronaves, das quais 126 deveriam estar prontas para combate. Naquele momento, a força ao seu dispor consistia em apenas 85 aparelhos. Não havia qualquer autoridade por parte da Grupo Naval para submeter um pedido de aeronaves. Raeder passou o pedido de mais recursos para Hitler, mas o Führer por sua vez passou o pedido para Göring.[13] O chefe supremo da Luftwaffe propôs que, do 12 staffeln[nota 1] de aeronaves navais, três staffeln fossem transferidas para o X. Fliegerkorps (10º Corpo Aéreo) que estava responsável por todas as operações anti-navio. Os restantes 9 staffeln permaneceriam na Kriegsmarine. Raeder rejeitou esta proposta através de uma carta a Göring no dia 31 de Outubro de 1939, argumentando que, pelo contrário, as staffeln deveriam ser expandidas para 24 até 1942; a isto, Göring não respondeu.[14]

No dia 21 de Dezembro de 1939 Raeder encontrou-se com Hitler e informou-o que as operações de reconhecimento aeronaval eram impossíveis de se realizar. Em responsta Göring permitiu que um conjunto de aviões Dornier Do 17 destinados ao X. Fliegerkorps fosse em vez disso para a Kriegsmarine. No dia 15 de Janeiro de 1940 o Almirante Otto Schniewind elaborou um memorando onde ressaltou que que apenas 14 staffeln estavam à disposição da marinha. Schniewind argumentou também que o X. Fliegerkorps tinha a responsabilidade pelas operações aeronavais para assistir as unidades controladas pela marinha. Neste memorando, também pediu que fosse disponibilizados os novos Dornier Do 217 para uso naval. Göring estava a tentar limitar o número de esquadrões navais para nove multifunções e seis de reconhecimento, contudo não conseguiu resistir à sugestão em que o X. Fliegerkorps deveriam começar a realizar operações anti-navio, recusando em vez disso que fossem usados os novos Do 210; em vez destes, declarou que os He 115 teriam que ser suficientes sob a premissa de que seriam destacados para o X. Fliegerkorps. No dia 4 de Abril de 1940 Göring implementou outro programa para reduzir a força aeronaval de doze para nove Junkers Ju 88 num staffel, onze aviões Do 17 por staffel de aviões Do 17 e nove Blohm & Voss BV 138 nos esquadrões equipado por este tipo.[15] A proposta foi entregue à marinha na véspera da Operação Weserübung, a invasão da Dinamarca e da Noruega. Nesta campanha, a pequena força aeronaval foi capaz de cumprir com os objectivos operacionais em missões anti-navio e contra as forças navais do inimigo.[16]

No dia 10 de Maio de 1940, a Wehrmacht invadiu e conquistou a Holanda, a Bélgica e a França em apenas 46 dias, assegurando a rendição francesa a 25 de Junho de 1940. A conquista da europa ocidental não era o fim da guerra, mas um meio para alcançar o fim. A ocupação da França posicionou os alemães para uma invasão, por meios aéreos e marítimos, da Grã-Bretanha. A vantagem estratégica ganha pela posse de bases aéreas e bases navais no território francês virado para o Oceano Atlântico colocava os U-boot e as aeronaves alemãs mais perto de linhas de suprimento que passavam do Estreito de Gibraltar até ao Reino Unido, e as posses no norte do território francês posicionava os alemães ao alcance de importantes portos navais britânicos. Esta posição permitia aos submarinos alemães penetrar mais longe no atlântico, até à costa norte-americana e canadiana—esta última protegida pela Real Marinha Canadiana, a terceira maior força naval no mundo em 1945.[17][18] Esta vantagem permitia aos U-boot evitar a perigosa passagem até ao Atlântico através do Mar do Norte ou pior, o Canal da Mancha, permitindo também estender o alcance das operações aéreas da Luftwaffe.[19][20]

Operações contra a Grã-Bretanha[editar | editar código-fonte]

Em 1940 a Luftwaffe ainda não tinha uma estrutura de comando e recursos em várias áreas essenciais. O ramo aéreo alemão começava a sofrer com a falta de aeronaves com design especializado para operações marítimas e um comando interessado na aviação naval, possuindo um comandante-em-chefe inflexível quando surgia a oportunidade de cooperar com a Kriegsmarine. Isto assegurava que os responsáveis pela estratégia de guerra alemã, na altura, não fossem capazes de reconhecer o potencial dano que a Luftwaffe poderia infligir às comunicações marítimas britânicas. O comando da Luftwaffe estava demasiado ocupado a repor as suas perdas causadas pela campanha na Europa Ocidental que tinha destruído 28% das suas aeronaves.[21][22] Embora ainda conseguisse comandar cerca de 1000 bombardeiros médios em Julho de 1949, a Luftwaffe não possuía aeronaves aeronavais de longo alcance nem aeronaves capazes de lançar torpedos, nem sequer tinha experiência suficiente em operações contra embarcações. Esta falha, apesar dos constantes avisos da Kriegsmarine, não era aparente aos olhos dos comandantes da Luftwaffe. A ameaça dos aviões alemães contra embarcações mercantes e até mesmo navios de guerra tornou-se aparente na campanha na Noruega.[23]

O OKL não via as comunicações marítimas britânicas como o principal alvo para a força aeronaval. Göring e Hans Jeschonnek pensavam que um ataque aéreo à Grã-Bretanha destruiria as fabricas de armamento, a Real Força Aérea (RAF) e baixaria a moral britânica. A ofensiva aérea durante a Batalha de Inglaterra, pensavam eles, seria suficiente para convencer os britânicos a aceitarem a oferta de paz. O Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (OKW) tinha esperança que uma negociação de paz evitaria um difícil desembarque na costa britânica, com o nome de código Operação Leão Marinho. Hitler estava receptivo relativamente a esta ideia, e a sua directiva N.º 17 certificava os esforços alemães no planeamento e execução da Operação Ataque da Água, que intensificava a luta pela superioridade aérea no sul da Inglaterra depois de 13 de Agosto. Nesta operação, atacar as embarcações britânicas ficou em segundo lugar na lista de prioridades, sendo a prioridade a destruição da RAF e as industrias militares.[24] A estratégia demonstrava até onde o OKL estava disposto a ir para ganhar a guerra, usando exclusivamente o poder aéreo contra alvos em terra.[25] As operações aérea que se precederam foram realizadas contra portos marítimos e algumas embarcações entre Julho e Agosto de 1940, uma fase conhecida como KanalKampf; estes ataques foram o preludio da batalha pela superioridade aérea que seria imperativa de se conseguir para se poder realizar o desembarque na costa britânica. Em Agosto, as investidas anti-navio desceram para 239 ataques e em Setembro para 90.[26]

Para a Kriegsmarine esta estratégia era a menos desejável. Raeder e Karl Donitz, comandante da força de submarinos, acreditavam que a concentração da Luftwaffe naquelas tarefas era uma oportunidade desperdiçada e que interferiam com as necessidades da marinha que solicitava mais apoio e reconhecimento aéreo na Batalha do Atlântico.[27] Em Julho e no início de Agosto de 1940 eles os dois convenceriam o OKL a atacar rotas marítimas e portos marítimos com lançamento de minas navais.[28] O lançamento de minas revelar-se-ia extremamente produtivo. A falta de recursos nesta fase negava a estas operações a chance de ter um resultado decisivo,[29] contudo a marinha continuava com esperança de poder atacar os centros mais importantes das linhas de comunicação marítimas britânicas—os portos marítimos de Londres, Liverpool e Bristol. A marinha acreditava que lançar minas navais nestes portos, juntamente com um forte ataque contra os mesmos, traria à Alemanha uma vitória decisiva.[22]

Em Outubro de 1940, as batalhas aéreas diurnas nos céus da Grã-Bretanha estavam a perder intensidade, abrindo lugar à intensificação dos combates nocturnos. Raeder e Dönitz fizeram pressão em Hitler para dedicar mais energia ao bombardeamento de portos marítimos e a estratégia aérea alemã mudou, passando a atacar cidades que possuíam portos marítimos. Mais tarde, em Novembro de 1940, os ataques contra os comboios marítimos voltaram a ocorrer, ataques estes que consistiam principalmente no lançamento de minas. Até esta altura os alemães usavam a táctica de lançar algumas minas numa grande área geográfica para obrigar as forças britânicas a usar muitos recursos à procura das minas. Contudo, para garantir que as entradas dos portos marítimos eram preenchidas devidamente com minas de modo a garantir o sucesso da operação, tantas minas quanto possível eram despejadas numa pequena área. Esta táctica revelou-se bem sucedida no estuário do rio Tamisa, onde os alemães conseguiram afundar nove barcos a vapor e deixando o rio bloqueado por 14 dias.[30] A importação de bens através dos portos marítimos só foi o alvo principal a partir de 6 de Fevereiro de 1941, quando Hitler assinou a Directiva N.º 23.[31][32] No final da ofensiva aérea contra a Grã-Bretanha, em Maio de 1941, à medida que os alemães se preparavam para a invasão da União Soviética (Operação Barbarossa), a Luftwaffe tinha provocado sérios danos aos alvos estipulados durante a ofensiva. Em operações aéreas contra Liverpool cerca de 75% da capacidade do porto marítimo ficou reduzido num determinado ponto, tendo perdido cerca de 40 000 toneladas de embarcações em ataques aéreas e ficando com 110 000 toneladas danificadas.[33] Contudo, as más condições atmosféricas e o omnipresente Göring fizeram com que as forças navais não conseguissem adquirir influência nem vantagem durante as operações.[34]

Formation of Fliegerführer Atlantik[editar | editar código-fonte]

On 6 January 1941, while Göring was on holiday, Raeder approached Hitler asking for more support to assist the growing successes of the U-Boats. Despite Göring's resistance, and under pressure from the navy, Hitler gave Raeder one Gruppe (Group) from Kampfgeschwader 40 (I./KG 40—1st group, Bomber Wing 40). The furious Göring returned and immediately engaged in political manipulation to have it returned to Luftwaffe control. He proposed that it be returned in exchange for an Atlantic command.[35] Regardless of Raeder's objections, on 28 February 1941,[35] Hitler agreed to Goring's "compromise" and authorised the formation of a Luftwaffe naval command, under the control of Luftflotte 3 (Air Fleet 3) and its commander Hugo Sperrle. Named Fliegerführer Atlantik, it was based at Lorient. Martin Harlinghausen was selected to command the organisation. He had been a naval officer in the 1920s but had moved to the Luftwaffe and acted as chief of staff for X. Fliegerkorps in Norway, and was a leading authority in anti-shipping attacks with bombs. He was a logical choice to lead Atlantic air operations.[36][37] His headquarters were stationed in the village of Brandérion.[38]

Harlinghausen was responsible for organising fleet support, meteorological missions and even coastal protection, although Küstenfliegergruppe (KuFlGr) (coastal aircraft group), Minensuchgruppe (MSGr—minesearch group) existed for that purpose. He had barely 100 aircraft operational including Arado Ar 196 float aircraft. His commitment to the Mediterranean Theatre of Operations while managing the staff of X Fliegerkorps, delayed his command until 31 March 1941. He agreed with the operational methods of Dönitz, who favoured using the four-engine Focke-Wulf Fw 200 "Condors" to shadow convoys and direct U-Boats to their quarry; then to begin a coordinated air-sea attack to defeat the convoy.[39]

Harlinghausen was given meager forces to achieve these ends KG 40, based at Cognac and Bordeaux was handed over to him, containing all three groups of the unit (I., II., and III./KG 40). Küstenfliegergruppe 106, 406, 506, 606 and 906 were also made available, based at Amsterdam, (Netherlands), Brest, Westerland, Lannion, (France), Aalborg, (Denmark). Aufklärungsgruppe 122, a reconnaissance unit, was based in several locations; at Amsterdam, Brest and Wilhelmshaven. Stab./KG 40 was known to have just one Fw 200 on strength on 31 March 1941.[40] Owing to Hitler's order on 6 January 1941, I./KG 40 was initially under the command of Dönitz, who at that time was based at Lorient. It had only eight Fw 200s on strength at the end of 1940, and subsequent strength is unknown.[40] II./KG 40 was formed with 1 Staffel on 1 January. The 5th and 6th Staffel worked up on Heinkel He 111 and Dornier Do 217 E-1s into late June 1941. On 26 July it was declared operational, and transferred to Cognac with 29 Do 217s (12 operational) and one He 111.[41] III./KG 40 was known to have been formed on or about 24 March 1941, and was based at Brest. Strength details are unknown in 1941, but the unit did operate He 111s and the Fw 200.[42]

It is estimated by April, 1941, Fliegerführer Atlantik had on strength 21 Fw 200s, 26 He 111s, 24 Heinkel He 115s, and a mixed force of Messerschmitt Bf 110s and Junkers Ju 88s, numbering 12 aircraft. The total number of aircraft by July 1941 had reached 155; 29 Fw 200s, 31 He 111s, 45 Ju 88s, 18 He 115s, 20 Dornier Do 217s, 12 Bf 110s and Ju 88 specialised reconnaissance aircraft.[43] The command was not helped by the minuscule production of Fw 200 aircraft that remained at five per month in April 1941.[44] 32 Ju 88s from KüFlGr 106 were added to the command's order of battle.[45]

Equipment and tactics[editar | editar código-fonte]

The Fw 200 was the main weapon in the early rounds of the Atlantic air war. Its combat prowess rested on three vital capabilities: its ability to find targets, to hit targets and then to evade enemy defences. In 1940 the Fw 200s had only rudimentary capability of finding convoys and other suitable merchant targets. On a typical mission, an Fw 200 would fly about 1,500 km from Bordeaux to look for targets, west of Ireland, which gave the aircraft approximately three hours to conduct its search. Normally, Condors flew quite low (about 500 – 600 metres off the water), which made it easier to spot ships outlined against the horizon and avoided giving Allied shipping much warning. From this low altitude the Condor could search an area approximately the 320 by 120 km (200 by 75 nautical miles), which several crewman searching for ships with binoculars. In good weather, which was rare in the Atlantic, the observers might spot a convoy 15–20 km (10–12 miles) away, but cloud cover could reduce this by half. In 1941, improved Fw 200s meant longer range, and a four-hour station (up from three) could be maintained, which increased the search area by 25 per cent. In December 1942, the low-UHF band FuG 200 Hohentwiel ASV radar extended the search area to four times that of 1940. The radar could detect a ship 80 km (50 mi) away and its beam was 41 km (25 mi).[46]

There were perennial problems for KG 40, and the other ‘Condor units'. Lack of numbers and serviceability meant there was no guarantee that one or two sorties of three to eight hours would be active when a convoy passed through air space in range of the Luftwaffe. Thus the ability of Fliegerführer Atlantik to find convoys remained sporadic until late in the command's service.[47]

Further limitations were a result of the design. A lack of proper bombsight equipment and poor forward visibility meant the aircraft had to attack from low level. This meant an approach at just 45 metres at 290 km/h (180 mph) and then release of bombs at 240 metres (790 ft) from the target. This was known as the "Swedish turnip" tactic by crews. This allowed for a high chance of a direct hit or damaging near miss. The Fw 200 carried four SC 250 kg bombs, ensuring a hit potential. Merchant vessels lacked armour or damage-control systems at that time, so a hit or more would have a high chance of sinking a ship. This meant an average of one ship sunk for every attack made. At low level, it was not uncommon for German crews to achieve three out of four hits. However, many bombs failed to explode at low level, owing to improper fusing of the ordnance. Once the Lotfernrohr 7D bombsight was introduced— with a similar degree of accuracy to the top secret American Norden bombsight— more accurate bombing from 3,000 metres (9,840 feet) could take place with an error range of just 91 metres (300 feet). Later Fw 200s were fitted with heavier machine guns and cannon, so that strikes at low level could also damage the superstructure of ships.[46]

Improvements quickly implemented but the type was a civilian design, converted to military use. Initially Fw 200Bs were built to fly in thin air at high altitude, with no sharp manoeuvring. Kurt Tank— its designer—had made the aircraft's long range possible by using a light airframe that was two to four tons lighter than its contemporaries. This meant the aircraft did not have fuel tank sealant or armour protection. An under-strength structure contributed to these vulnerabilities, which made the Fw 200 unable to sustain much punishment. The engines were also underpowered, meaning it struggled to stay airborne if one was knocked out. The six unarmoured fuel tanks inside the cabin made it exceptionally prone to bursting into flames. When a Condor attempted to manoeuvre to avoid anti-aircraft fire or enemy fighters, its weak structure could be damaged, causing metal fatigue and cracks, resulting in the loss of the aircraft.[48] In the C variant, major improvements were made to its defensive armament, causing fighters to avoid lengthy duels. However, they operated at low level mostly, to avoid attacks from below. This limited their operational range and options. They could ‘jink' to throw an enemy aircraft off its aim, but they could not outrun or outturn an opponent. Poor evasion qualities meant the type was not the ideal operational weapon.[49]

Combat operations[editar | editar código-fonte]

The Luftwaffe effort extended into the North and central Atlantic but cooperation between aircraft and submarines occurred more by accident than by design. Dönitz had foreseen the need for very long-range reconnaissance aircraft exercises with submarines in May 1938. He selected the Dornier Do 26 seaplane for service with Transozeanstaffel (Trans-Ocean Squadron) in October 1939. Unfortunately most of the aircraft were used in the invasion of Norway and the survivors were not a sufficient force. They served from Brest until March 1941 when they returned to Germany. Donitz then placed his faith in the Heinkel He 177 program but the type suffered development problems and he had to settle for the Fw 200 as an interim solution. I./KG 40 under the command of Major Edgar Petersen was the first unit to reach Brest in July. Peterson, however, was employed in mine-laying operations with caused 16.6 percent losses. Peterson angrily protested to the then Chief of Staff Hans Jeschonnek who returned the unit to the reconnaissance role. The unit proved to be of little use. Crews were too few and restricted to two or three sorties every two weeks. Reports also had to pass through several commands—Fliegerkorps IV (to which I./KG 40 was attached) and then the naval command in France Marine Gruppe West—before being dispatched to submarine flotillas.[50]

First "happy time"[editar | editar código-fonte]

The period, August 1940 to May 1941, was known by the Kriegsmarine as the First Happy Time, because of the considerable amount of Allied ships sunk for light losses in U-boats. Before the formation of Fliegerführer Atlantik, the success of air attack on convoys during this time was almost immediate. Under the command of Dönitz, in August 1940–February 1941, Fw 200s sank 52 ships for only four losses.[51] At this time several anti-shipping leaders emerged. One pilot, Oberleutnant Bernhard Jope, crippled the RMS Empress of Britain. The sinking ship received a coup de grâce by Predefinição:GS, commanded by Hans Jenisch. Hans Buchholz would also become another successful merchant ship "killer."[52] By Christmas 1940, KG 40 had sunk 19 ships of approximately 100,000 tons and damaged 37— 180,000–tons worth of shipping. In January 1941, 17 ships were sunk amounting to 65,000 tons and five damaged.[53] February was worse for the British, losing 21 ships to Fw 200s, totalling 84,301 tons.[54]

The British recognised the threat posed by long-range German naval aircraft and set operations in motion to destroy the Condors at base. A Commando mission was considered but dismissed for operational difficulties and the likelihood of failure and heavy casualties. Instead, RAF Bomber Command was asked to destroy the bases on the Atlantic coast. These operations had been carried out before Fliegerführer Atlantik had been formed. An RAF raid on 22/23 November 1940 destroyed four hangars and two Fw 200s. Follow up raids were unsuccessful, and it was not until 13 April 1941 that three more Fw 200s were lost to air attack. The British failed to disrupt production at the Focke-Wulf plant at Bremen or to destroy more Condors in the field, due to poor bombing accuracy and improved German defences.[55]

In January 1941, convoy HX 90, OB 274, HG 50 and SL 61 were attacked with success. The later raid, on 19 January, sank seven ships from HG 50 and SL 61.[53] On 8 February, U-35 found convoy HG 53. The U-Boat reported its presence to Fliegerführer Atlantik. I./KG 40 was dispatched and sank five ships (Predefinição:GRT), although Predefinição:GRT was claimed.[39] The role was reversed a few days later when convoy OB 288 was discovered by Fw 200s[52]. I./KG 40 damaged two ships amounting to 11,249 tons. After the attack the Fw 200s alerted the submarines.[56] U-73, U-96, U-69, U-107 and U-552 sank a number of ships.[56] On 26 February U-47 led six Fw 200s to a convoy it had attacked. The submarine sank three and damaged two ships. The Condors sank another seven totalling Predefinição:GRT. Another four ships—Predefinição:GRT—were damaged. The operation was the greatest single success for KG 40. A straggler was sunk by the Bianchi.[57] In general, inadequate navigation training, exacerbated by out-of-date meteorological data, created errors in location of reports of up to 450 quilômetros (280 mi), while 19 per cent of all reports gave errors in course of up to 90 degrees.[39]

Photograph of KG 40 personnel, Bordeaux, 1941.

The creation of Fliegerführer Atlantik gave Dönitz cause for optimism. It was not always easy, communicating and coordinating with air and sea forces. U-Boats were unable to make accurate navigation using sun or star sightings and even when convoys were located they had trouble homing in bombers because their short-range transmitters were too weak to reach the aircraft. However, they were strong enough to alert British defences. Harlinghausen was irritated when his aircraft communicated accurate locations and the U-Boats failed to respond. Only when he complained to the BdU did he learn from Donitz that the navy often failed to inform the Luftwaffe that there were no U-Boats in the area to respond. There were also errors in reports pertaining to location and course of convoys. By the end of March, 1941, attempts at close cooperation were abandoned in favour of more flexible approached. Dönitz noted in his war diary that enemy signals about German air attacks would allow his intelligence (B-Dienst) to locate the convoy. He supposed that this would offer a better chance of interception.[39]

During the first quarter of 1941, the Condors sank Predefinição:GRT, the vast majority being lone ships. In one case, a sustained attack upon convoy OB 290 on 26 February 1941 accounted for seven to nine vessels (Predefinição:GRT), all sunk by KG 40 Fw 200s. However, with never more than eight aircraft operational, this was an exception. Soon, British CAM ship (catapult aircraft merchantmen) appeared, and the time of light Condor losses ended.[39][54] Buchholtz himself was killed when he encountered the SS Umgeni.[58] Fw 200s flew long-flight patterns from Bordeaux to Stavanger in Norway. This tactic discovered convoy OB 287. Aircraft and submarines sank three and damaged three.[59] The signal from the Fw 200s was picked up by U-47, and Günther Prien led the seaborne attack.[57]

Dönitz envisaged a cooperation of air and sea forces in mass attacks against convoys. The wolfpack tactics were proving successful, and he sought to supplement them with the Luftwaffe. The Condors were to break up the convoys, and scatter them so the Wolf packs could move in and dispatch the ships while they were unprotected. In March, the Luftwaffe won back control of KG 40 had placed under Harlinghausen's control, and success dried up KG 40 was forced to suspend operations for two weeks (probably due to insufficient support).[60] The unit sank three ships in March—Benvorlich on the 19th, Beaverbrae, 25th and on the 26th Empire Mermaid.[61]

On 30/31 March 1941, an effort to lead U–73, U-97 and U-101 to OB 302, located by two FW 200s failed.[62] In April KG 40 was only able to make 74 sorties. Attacks had been carried out on the 6 and 16 April and by the end of the month, seven ships had been sunk. More ominously, RAF Coastal Command was making better efforts to defend convoys against air attack. On 16 April, a Bristol Beaufighter from RAF Aldergrove shot down a Fw 200C-3 – the first Condor lost in action to an enemy fighter. On 18 April, another Condor was badly damaged by fire from HG 58 and crashed in Ireland. Further operations failed. OB 316, 318 and HX 122 escaped the commands shadowing efforts. SL 72 and OB 321 were found on 11 and 14 May, and aircraft sank one ship from each convoy, but failed to guide any U-Boats to their targets. In May, only three ships were sunk and one damaged.[63] Around this time, the He 111 units were withdrawn owing to heavy losses in the Channel. They were replaced by Kampfgeschwader 26 and Kampfgeschwader 30 (Bomber Wing 26 and 30), which had remained under Luftflotte 5 after the withdrawal of Fliegerkorps X to the Mediterranean. These units made up 20 He 111 and 24 Ju 88s, which operated directly against British shipping and ports.[43] III./KG 40 also converted to the Fw 200 instead of the He 111, to allow it to operate further away from Britain and avoid air attack.[64] Losses were isasteous for KG 40 in April. Seven Fw 200s and their crews were lost.[44]

The British response to the Condors was simple but effective. Merchant ships were still lightly armed with anti-aircraft weapons.[64] When a formation of German aircraft attacked, instead of staying formed in front of the convoy to protect against U-Boats, they withdrew to the rear and formed a tight defensive circle. They then used all the available firepower they could muster to deter attacks. It worked when KG 40 attempted to attack HG 65 using the "Swedish turnip" method. The ships drove off the attack. The Germans lost two Fw 200s, one crashed in Portugal, the other in Spain. The Spanish allowed German technical teams to recover the aircraft and crew. OG 66 was also missed. By the end of June, only four ships (Predefinição:GRT) had been sunk for four losses.[65]

The Hawker Sea Hurricane W9182 on the catapult of a CAM ship.

During the Bismarck's sortie Operation Rheinübung in May 1941, Fliegerführer Atlantik was ordered by Göring to provide cover for its return to port.[58] Kampfgruppe 100, Kampfgeschwader 1, 54 and 77 were made available for this purpose. They failed and Bismarck was sunk. Fliegerführer Atlantik'ss commanding officer, Martin Harlinghausen, came in for much criticism for failing to help the ship. The sinking of Bismarck ended German surface vessel activity in the Atlantic for the remainder of the war.[66] The Ju 88s and He 111s could not reach Bismarck, but did sink HMS Mashona and flew 158 sorties against warships.[58]

The relations between the Kriegsmarine had hardly been improved with the failure of Rheinübung. Since 1937 Göring and the Luftwaffe had thwarted any attempt by the navy to produce a naval air arm. Not only did the Luftwaffe maintain control over all aspects of aviation, the naval commanders, Raeder and Dönitz, had to rely on Göring's good will. In order to have air support, the highest authorities in both services had to consult on the use of tactical units. Even if the negotiations were devoid of friction, it was inflexible and inefficient system.[67]

In June 1941, the enemy's growing anti-submarine capabilities forced Dönitz to operate 20°W, beyond the range of the Condors, which now interdicted the sea lanes between Gibraltar and Britain. The command's aircraft were ordered to Bordeaux for this purpose by July. Dönitz' decision irritated Harlinghausen, who planned a major offensive in the summer and the relations between the two men cooled, only to warm again when the aircraft reverted to reconnaissance roles supporting U-Boats—ironically because shipping defences had proven so successful Fw 200s could only attack when they had cloud cover. Gibraltar traffic was easier to monitor. The Fw 200s flew Fächer (Fan) search patterns from 45°N and 34°S and 19°W (sometimes 25°W) and found targets that way.[68]

In July—December 1941, the success of Fliegerführer Atlantik was mixed. After a failed attack on HG.65, Harlinghausen ordered the abandonment of the "Swedish turnip" tactic since they were too vulnerable to improving British defensive armament. In July, the official orders of Fliegerführer Atlantik amounted authorisation for reconnaissance only. No attacks were to be made against convoys only individual ships could be attacked. They found four convoys for U-Boats in July, but made no attacks themselves. On 18 July, Hauptmann Fritz Fliegel, a Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross holder, attempted to attack convoy OB 346. He targeted the 7,046-ton freighter Pilar de Larrinaga. However the gunners shot his starboard wing off and he crashed into the sea, killing all on board. Another Fw 200C-3 was shot down 400 km (250 mi) west of Ireland by a Lockheed Hudson of No. 233 Squadron RAF. The crew were rescued. In total, four Fw 200s were lost.[69]

British countermeasures[editar | editar código-fonte]

On 2 August the British catapult concept was validated. From the CAM ship SS Maplin, Lieutenant Bob Everett took off in a Hawker Hurricane and succeeded in downing a Condor shadowing SL 81 KG 40 had some revenge when a Condor sank a freighter, and a U-Boat attack sank five more ships from the 20-strong convoy on 5 August.[69] British defences forced the Fw 200s to revert to reconnaissance. However, a major battle developed over several separate convoys; Convoy HG 73 and HG.74 in September. HG 73 was composed of 25 merchantmen and 11 escorts including HMS Springbank, a catapult ship. A Fairey Fulmar launched but coul not fire. Without air cover the convoy was subjected to attack by sea and air. The Condors guided the submarines in and the U-Boats sank 10 ships, including Springbank. Simultaneously, the battle for HG 74 began. This convoy had 26 ships and ten escorts including the first escort carrier to be built—HMS Audacity. A Fw 200 sank a ship picking up survivors from a U-Boat attack (Walmer Castle). The attack alerted two fighters, which dispatched the Condor. Remaining Condors kept their distance. They soon picked up OG 75. Despite poor weather and improved defences, the Condors shadowed OG 75 eight days. But the strong escort limited the attacks to one loss. HG 74 made it to Liverpool from Gibraltar without loss.[70][71] Convoy OG 69 and Convoy OG 71 were also savaged by a combined air and submarine attack. The cooperation accounted for 45 percent of the tonnage sunk by U-boats from July to October.[72]

The Fw 200s proceeded with caution after the Audacity battle. Four U-boats had been lost and the efectiveness of fighter defences improved. Successes declined and losses rose to 13 aircraft—10 to British defences. Production failures placed increased strain on pilots. They were ordered not to ditch but to fly home and save the damaged aircraft. One pilot flew across neutral Ireland to reach Brest. New aircraft were collected from the factories immediately upon completion. Decreasing sparse forces further, Harlinghausen sent Condors and their pilots on torpedo bomber courses, which failed to yield positive results.[72] The power of ship-based anti-aircraft fire and escorts forced the Condors to fly higher. The introduction of carrier fighters forced them to operate with extreme caution. [61]

In October, Martin Harlinghausen himself was wounded. Although unusual for a commander, he took part in operations to experience combat conditions for himself. In an attack on shipping in the Bristol Channel, he was wounded. His deputy Ulrich Kessler temporarily took command. Kessler had not held high rank before now, an indicator of how unimportant the OKL viewed Luftwaffe operations over the Atlantic.[73]

A Condor sinking. Airmen are exiting the aircraft, 26 July 1941—54° 00' N., 13∘ 35' W.[74]

On 6 November, the units of Fliegerführer Atlantik engaged OG 76 in a month-long battle, which lasted until 16 December. The convoy had left Liverpool bound for Gibraltar on 28 October. Sighted by KG 40 on 6 November, six Fw 200s were to shadow and direct U-Boats to it. HMS Audacity was present, and launched her fighters against the Condors, downing one Fw 200. Five U-Boats were guided in, but were repulsed by the escorts and the convoy which made it to Gibraltar unscathed. On 14 December it returned to Liverpool. By 16 December, KG 40 had picked it up. The U-Boats were repulsed again, and the Fw 200s were forced to retreat under fighter attack on 18 December. On 19 December, two Condors were lost to Audacity's fighters. With the Condors out of the battle, the U-Boats tried on their own, sinking one destroyer and two merchant ships. On 21 December, Audacity was spotted outside the convoy and was sunk in ten minutes. Five of her six fighter pilots from No. 802 Squadron FAA were saved. With the carrier gone, the Condors returned. They noted the presence of an RAF B-24 Liberator, but no engagement is known.[75]

The British responded to German submarine operations by attacking them as the transited the Bay of Biscay. Five out of six U-boats took this route, and passed within range of RAF air bases. Coastal Command resolved to interdict these routes. From June to November 1941 and was known as the "First Bay Offensive". In the period, 1 September to 30 November, 3,600 flying hours were made, producing 31 sightings, 28 attacks, which possible heavily damaged only five U-boats. The only victim of the offensive was U-206, sunk by a No. 502 Squadron RAF aircraft guided by ASR.[76]

On 11 December 1941 Hitler declared war on the United States. While this gave German submarines plenty of targets, the order to send more vessels to American waters made less U-Boats available for cooperation with Fliegerführer Atlantik. Between 1 August 1940 and 31 December 1941, Fw 200s made 41 contacts with convoys, 18 were exploited by U-Boats that sank 48 merchant ships (Predefinição:GRT), along with two destroyers, a corvette and Audacity.[77] Harlinghausen frequently complained that his Condors had succeeded in finding convoys only for no U-boat attacks to take place. The cause was the lack of any U-boats in position to exploit the finding; a fact Dönitz did not relay to Fliegerführer Atlantik.[78]

The last six months of 1941 had been a severe blow to Fliegerführer Atlantik. It had sunk just four ships (10,298 tons) and damaged two for the loss of 16 Condors, including seven to convoy defences. The carrier ship had validated the concept of the escort carrier, which the Admiralty pursued with interest. The air war over the Atlantic and battle for Britain's sea communications had turned against the Germans in this period.[70] From 15 March to 31 October 1941 Fliegerführer Atlantik reported 57 convoys. Through cooperation with U-boats 74 ships, totalling 390,000 tons, one aircraft carrier, and one destroyer were sunk. The command sank 161 vessels for 903,000 grt, probably sank seven for 31,000 grt, damaged 113 for 590,000 grt.[79] Within six months, this trend underwent a radical change. The transfer of Condors to other theatres, according to OKL wartime report, in mid-December 1941 brought air-submarine cooperation to "a standstill".[80] The only remaining naval reconnaissance outfit—KüFlGr 106—did not have the range to reach deep into the Atlantic an were restricted to coastal attacks and observation operations.[80]

1942: Second Happy Time[editar | editar código-fonte]

Hitler's declaration of war against the United States on 11 December 1941, in support of his Axis partner, the Empire of Japan, opened up the western Atlantic and American shipping to U-boats which had previously been ordered to avoid contact with the then-neutral Americans. The decision provided immediate tactical advantages against the unprepared Americans along the East Coast of the United States. The campaign became known as the "Second Happy Time" to U-boat crews, but not to Fliegerführer Atlantik.[81]

On 5 January 1942, Harlinghausen was replaced by Ulrich Kessler. Kessler endured the same supply problems as his predecessor. He was unable to support the U-Boats on the west side of the Atlantic, nor interdict convoy routes while anti-shipping operations turned to the Mediterranean and Arctic Convoys. Italian-designed aerial torpedoes (F5a) had proven successful in the Regia Aeronautica (Royal Italian Air Force) and in the Luftwaffe, but these weapons were given to KG 26 and other units operating against shipping in the Mediterranean Sea and against the Arctic convoys off Norway.[77] Over the course of these unfolding events from 26 July 1941 to 30 April 1942, Fliegerführer Atlantik shrank from 90 to 16 combat aircraft and from 25 to 20 Fw 200s.[82] During the "happy time", known as Operation Drumbeat, Hitler remained steadfast in his view that the priorities of German air power remained elsewhere as the naval staff pressed for more Fw 200s and the newer Heinkel He 177.[83]

As the new war developed, III./KG 40 was converting from the He 111 to the Fw 200. A number of the Condors were abruptly sent to the Mediterranean and to take up transport operations on the Eastern Front. Condor operations fell to the lowest recorded through 1942, until 1943.[84] Anti-shipping operations in British coastal waters continued into 1942 and extended into the Irish Sea. Ju 88 and Do 217 aircraft from Luftflotte 3 took part, on occasion with torpedoes. Minelaying continued, but their operations were handled by Fliegerkorps X against Kessler's protests to have all such units under his command. Even so, Fliegerkorps X lost bomber units—such as KG 2—to the bombing campaign over Britain. Coastal operations were costly—in April 1941 III./KG 40 had been withdrawn when only eight of the 32 aircraft it was authorised were left.[85] New weapons platforms were considered for torpedo operations; even the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 fighter underwent testing. By early 1942, the majority of torpedo-equipped units had moved for operations in the Arctic Ocean or Mediterranean.[86] The last were removed by Göring with Hitler's approval on 21 April amid protests from Raeder. They were scheduled to return in July 1942.[87] The development of the aerial torpedo remained in the hands of the Kriegsmarine, and it was not until 1941 the Luftwaffe was finally granted jurisdiction and proceeded with urgency thus the first two years of war were wasted and little progress had been made.[88]

The command's order of battle consisted of only Stab. I., II., III./KG 40, Küstenfliegergruppe 106, and 5./BordFlGr 196. The latter was a simple Ar 196 floatplane staffel on 10 July 1942.[89] Kessler lamented the miuse of naval aircraft in bombing operations against Britain. In 1942, he wrote of the Baedeker Blitz;

My impression in the majority of cases, the aim of our sorties at present is more to placate the High Command than to cause any serious discomfort to the enemy. Of, for example, bombs dropped on English country houses where dances are taking place, there is little possibility of killing anyone of importance, since Churchill doesn’t dance, and other prominent personalities are generally beyond the age for such relaxation.[90]

In 1942 the Western Approaches and Bay of Biscay attracted the command's operations. The operational strength of Kessler's forces were very low and only reconnaissance missions could be carried out and attacks on coastal shipping when weather permitted when RAF Fighter Command could not intervene. In mid-1942, Fliegerführer Atlantik could field only 40 Ju 88s whereas the mine-laying Fliegerkorps IX had 90 Do 217s on its order of battle. Flag Officer of U-boats, Donitz, once again began placing demands on the fleet's forces. He requested defensive operations and reconnaissance missions to protect his submarines in transit from French ports in Saint-Nazaire, Bordeaux, Brest, Lorient and La Pallice to the Atlantic Ocean. RAF Coastal Command heavy fighters and anti-submarine aircraft were causing anxiety over the Bay and appeared to be intensifying operations against surfaced U-boats.[91]

These operations made up the majority of command operations.[92] In June 1942, a permanent tactical solution appeared to counter British operations in the Bay. A specialist heavy fighter unit, V./KG 40, equipped with the Ju 88C was formed at Bordeaux-Merignac on 24 June.[93] 13 and 14 staffel on 6 an 20 August an 15 staffel on 12 September using crews from IV/KG 6. The unit claimed a Short Sunderland on 1 September and another four aircraft on 15 September. On 1 December the group had 30 Ju 88Cs.[93] The unit did not have a full complement of aircraft for two months and at the end of the year it had 27, with eight lost in combat.[94]

From May 1942, heavy fighter units equipped with Ju 88s succeeded in driving Coastal Command into the Atlantic until the following year. Ḍönitz employed this way against standing orders from Hitler to use them for convoy reconnaissance and attacks over the Bay.[92] In August 1942 Coastal Command lost 26 aircraft—7 to German fighters.[94] In September 1942 the new combat unit accounted for eight aircraft.[95] Nevertheless, air raids on bases and transit routes cost the Germans the equivalent of 15-sea months in delays without sinking any U-boats.[96] In the last six months of 1942, the Luftwaffe made 70 interceptions claiming 22 aircraft. Coastal Command lost a total of 98 to all causes.[94]

The consequence of the lack of convoy reconnaissance and combat aircraft is evident in the statistics. In 1942, just three merchant ships were sunk by aircraft in the Atlantic amounting to 3,588 grt; the last in June 1942. In other theatres, German aircraft sank 19 in British waters, 41 in the Arctic and 31 in the Mediterranean.[82] In contrast, Kessler's airmen claimed 43,000 grt including a destroyer an Auxiliary cruiser—13 ships in all.[97] Over a seven week period, a daily average of six combat aircraft which operated between 38° and 49° north and 10° to 20° west, observed 4 million tons of shipping and spotted approximately 0.3 million tons of warships. The convoy remained in range of long-range bombers from five to six days. Approximately one-seventh of Allied shipping was in range of long-range aircraft.[92] The sightings rarely led to attacks on ships for most of the aircraft not armed with bombs. [92]

Technical developments in 1942 made high altitude bombing attacks possible. In the summer, the Lotfernrohr 7Ds were installed on the Fw 200. III./KG 40 converted to the sight in the spring, 1943 an achieved considerable success. With well trained crews the Luftwaffe could achieve a measure of success at acceptable cost.[92] Air-to-surface radar may have helped detect convoys from greater distance, and thus, with greater safety, but the installation progress was slow. The FuG Atlas Hohentwiel]] had been fitted to a Fw 200C-3/U3 in July 1941. Later, FuG Neptun-S (136 MHz) was trialled off Norway but both proved disappointing when compared to a captured 200MHz British metric Air-to-surface MK II radar. FuG Rostock was operating at 120MHz with 30km range but production and development allowed for the installation for only five Fw 200s by November 1942—one being the captured set.[97] In the autumn, 1942, development of the FuG 200 Hohentwiel 550MHz with a range of 80km. The small antennas did not degrade the performance of the aircraft. They type entered service in the Fw 200C-6. The low priority of Kessler's command resulted in just 16 of 26 Condors in III./KG 40 were fitted out by December 1943, four months after it entered service.[97]

1943: the "living corpse"[editar | editar código-fonte]

At the turn of the year more of the precious Fw 200s were siphoned off to other theatres. Operation Torch, the landings in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia absorbed more anti-shipping forces from Western Europe. On the Eastern Front, the Battle of Stalingrad led to the encirclement of several Axis armies and Fw 200s, with other long range types, were required to supply land forces trapped in the city.[98]

The command was briefly supplemented with the newly formed Kampfgeschwader 6 (KG 6), but Kessler soon learned he was to lose this wing. In a conversation with Hans Jeschonnek, chief of the general staff, Kessler recommended Fliegerführer Atlantik, which he described as "a living corpse", be disbanded.[97] Kessler continued to protest the diversion of aircraft to bombing Britain and the failure to upgrade the command to Fliegerdivision. Kessler demanded torpedo aircraft and radar with high altitude bomb sights.[97] Kessler told Jeschonnek sinking Allied convoys was the only way to render American and British industrial superiority irrelevant.[97]

Meanwhile, the defensive air war over the Bay of Biscay intensified during 1943.[99] The Luftwaffe could rarely provide adequate aircraft to protect U-boats in 1943. The air superiority operations became counterproductive for the signals traffic clued the British in as to when such an operation was under way.[100] German radar operators plotted 2,070 aircraft intrusions over the Bay during the spring.[101]

7./KG 40 Fw 200 on fire, pursued by a Bristol Beaufighter aircraft from No. 248 Squadron RAF, 12 March 1943.[102]

In February 1943, John Slessor Air Officer Commanding, Coastal Command, preferred attacking German vessels in the Bay of Biscay, in transit to the Atlantic. Slessor assigned No. 19 Group RAF. Operation Gondola, lasting from 4–16 February 1943, mounted 300 sorties. It achieved 19 sightings and 8 attacks. Only U-519 was sunk.[103] The activation of H2S radar squadrons enabled the British to attack undetected until a Short Stirling bomber was shot down over Rotterdam, enabling the Germans to develop counter measures. Supplemented by Leigh Lights, Coastal Command pose a danger to submarines. Operation Enclose, 20–28 March 1943, detected 26 of 41 U-boats passing through the Bay an resulted in 15 attacks. Only Predefinição:GS was sunk. Operation Enclose II, on 6 to 13 April, sighted 11 and attacked four of the 25 submarines passing through, sinking U-376. Operation Derange soon followed. 19 Group deployed 70 ASV III equipped B-24 Liberators, Vickers Wellingtons, and Handley Page Halifax aircraft. U-526 became the only casualty , sunk by a mine.[104] The offensive ended on 30 April 1943. The Command had flown 80,443 hours, lost 170–179 aircraft, sank 10 submarines, and damaged 24.[105][106] German fighters achieved one aerial victory in April 1943, albeit without recording any losses.[107]

From 3 June 1943, V./KG 40 increased fighter patrols prompting RAF Fighter Command to send flights of four de Havilland Mosquito long range aircraft to protect Coastal Command patrols.[102] V./KG 2 began converting from the Do 217 to Messerschmitt Me 410 for fighter operations. U-boat command ordered all submarines to travel in groups of three to four in daylight on the surface through the Bay, and fight it out with their powerful anti-aircraft artillery if intercepted.[102] The OKL placed faith in the Ju 88C-6, then R-2 fighters, to hold off the air attacks.[108] ZG 1 was transferred to the Bay of Biscay in July but unsustainable losses were suffered reducing the number of experienced crews causing probable morale problems.[107] In "Black May", 1943, ZG 1 was called into action with greater frequency as the U-boats were driven from the Atlantic Gap. The lack of combat training was expose and losses rose.[107] A notable incident was the death of film star, Leslie Howard, killed when shot own by a Ju 88 from V./KG 40.[109] Five fighters were lost in May 1943, a further four in June to 11 in July.[110] In August and September 1943 five aircraft were lost in each month.[111] The size of Fliegerführer Atlantik remained miniscule. On 10 July 1943 V./KG 40 and III./KG 40 were the only gruppen (groups) available. 1./SAGr 128 with Ar 196 an Fw 190 with Aufklstaffel (see) 222 were squadron-size strength units; the latter possessed Blohm & Voss BV 222.[112]

Ulrich Kessler in 1945. In 1942, he called Fliegerführer Atlantik " a living corpse"[113]

In February 1943, with the battle of the Atlantic reaching a climax, Dönitz demanded long-range aircraft from Göring but was rebuffed. Hitler intervened and ordered six Blohm & Voss BV 222 into the Atlantic but they did not become available until the summer because of the procrastination of the general staff. Only four Junkers Ju 290s and 10 modified Ju 88H aircraft were made available before the defeat of U-boats in Black May.[114] Kessler intended to use the BV 222s in 24-hour flights over the Atlantic where they could refuel from U-boat tankers at the Azores. Göring informed Dönitz that the He 177 could not be made available before the autumn, but the Messerschmitt Me 264 Amerika-Bomber had made its maiden flight eight weeks before and was still under development. Kessler had support from Sperrle, who optimistically told him that he hoped to create a further Fliegerkorps, named the III, with 22 Gruppen Kessler remarked that with such a fleet he could destroy 500,000 tons of shipping. In mid-March 1943, the Condor force had doubled to 39 aircraft although they could fly no more than 100 sorties per month.[114]

Donitz came close to severing the shipping lanes in March 1943. His U-boats sank 108 ships for some 627,377 grt this months, with just eight percent of those in cooperation with aircraft. During the first quarter of 1943 only six convoys were shadowed. The 74,954 grt sunk in coordination with the Luftwaffe in 1943, 85 percent were sunk in March. These achievements were mostly in connection with attacks on convoys XK 2 and Convoy HX 126.[114] SL 126 was picked up only late in the month, over 27–30 March.[115] The convoy's predecessor SL 125 had been so badly mauled the Sierra Leone route was abandoned for four months.[116] The battle was the last major action until Convoy HX 133.[117] XK 2 consisted of 20 ships protected by the 38th Escort Group—a highly experienced flotilla—was spotted by an Fw 200 and attacked by Do 217s from I./KG 40. Only one ship was slightly damaged and one U-boat lost when the Condor called a local wolfpack into action.[118] After March, only 14 convoys were reported while none were spotted in June 1943. With the Atlantic clear of German aircraft, Coastal Command carried out Anti-submarine warfare operations in the Bay of Biscay.[114] The Fw 200s continued patrolling, often in formation for added protection against marauding Beaufighters but also Liberators, B-17 Flying Fortress and Short Sunderlands.[114]

Kessler's frustration mounted and on 4 May 1943 he wrote to Jeschonnek claiming more than 3.75 grt of shipping was escaping interception on the Gibraltar lanes. Kessler requested the He 177 and Henschel Hs 293 guided missiles with which he confidently predicted the monthly destruction of 500,000 grt of shipping. Hitler sympathised in general and falsely insisted the He 177 delays had been entirely caused by the insistence of installing dive bombing capabilities. Even so, on 31 May 1943 Hitler said there could no let-up in the Atlantic for it was his first line of defence. State Secretary Erhard Milch, production supremo, sympathised but the equipment was not yet available.[119]

The Lofte 7D bombsight did make a difference to Fw 200 operations. The aircraft could now bomb accurately to within 20 to 30 metres from an altitude of 4,000 metres (13,000 ft). III./KG 40 used the device in 42 attacks—26 on convoys—and claimed 11 ships sunk for 79,050 grt from 23 February—1 October.[120] On 11 July 1943 five aircraft intercepted Convoy Faith. Liners SS Duchess of York and California were sunk. The freighter MV Port Fairy escaped toward Casablanca but the following evening was pursued and damaged by two Fw 200s.[121] Accurate high level bombing allowed for the success but it was to be a rare occurrence. [120] On 15 August 1943, 21 of the newly arrived Fw 200C-6 aircraft armed with Hs 293 radio controlled missiles attacked convoy OS53/KMS 23. The convoy was spotted by Fw 200s which reported the position some 220 miles west of Lisbon.[122] The attack was a disaster and 17 of the 21 aircraft were lost in combat.[120] Two ships, the Baron Fairlie and Ocean Faith were sunk in return.[123]

In September 1943, Göring ordered Fliegerführer Atlantik to direct and control long-range maritime reconnaissance operations. He also ordered them to carry out air superiority, anti-shipping, and to assist in anti-submarines operations by detecting enemy submarines. Göring apparently recognising the importance of using aircraft in the Atlantic, remarked, German "submarines and aircraft were pursuing the same aim and Fliegerführer Atlantik should therefore cooperate closely with BdU. Although limited forces are available at present, considerable success could be achieved."[124] At the time of the order, the command possessed just one Bv 222, 19 Fw 200s (four operational), 61 Ju 88C-6s (37 operational), six Ju 290s, and 24 He 177s. The supposed strength of the command in II./KG 40 was 30 He 177s, 45 in II./KG 40 alone. 1.(F)./SAGr 128 were supposed to have four Ar 196 an five Fw 190s for fighter operations base in Brest, 1.(F)./SAGr 129 were allotted two Bv 222s and two Blohm & Voss BV 138s. 1. and 2./ZG 1 were permitted 40 Ju 88C and Rs.[124] The BdU signalled its U-boat commanders that newer aircraft were available. In particular, the Ju 290—FuG 200 equipped—reconnaissance aircraft, which ha a range of 2,250 km (approximately 1,400 mi) was greeted with enthusiasm.[125]

In the autumn, 1943 Dönitz had conceded defeat in the North Atlantic. He moved his U-boats to parts of the ocean where his commanders faced fewer disadvantages. The Gibralta convoys sailing to Britain presented such an opportunity—particularly the SL convoys. Fliegerführer Atlantik bases in France were well within range of the convoy routes. Befehlshaber der U-Boote (BdU) was certain that U-boat operations would fail if the Luftwaffe continued to avoid allocating aircraft to air protection of submarines and air reconnaissance. The unwillingness of Luftwaffe was in sharp contrast fo Allied air forces.[126] Only one attempt to use aircraft in cooperation with U-boats in October 1943 was against Convoy SC 143. The single BV 222, one of very few in operation did not succeed in bringing the Wolfpacks to interception. The BV 222 reached the convoy but not a single U-boat picked up the homing signals.[127] Seven Allied aircraft were in operation over the convoy and at least one U-boat was sunk by air attack.[128] An Fw 200 played a role in locating Convoy SL 140/MKS 31, but the interception was a failure.[129]

In October 1943, cooperation against Convoy SL 138/MKS 28 and MKS 29 failed—one ship was sunk at the cost of U-306 and U-707.[130] The naval staff, as usual, blamed the lack of adequate of reconnaissance and combat aircraft to hold off Allied naval air power.[131] In mid-November Dönitz moved 26 U-boats into position to intercept the next convoy. He placed six more in reserve. Three daily flights were ordered to cover them. The British learned through ULTRA, on 14 November, that Dönitz intended to use a defence in depth to catch the convoy in three patrol lines. The subsequent Convoy SL 139/MKS 30 defeated the German attacks. Night attacks were disrupted by ASR and Leigh Light Wellingtons from No. 179 Squadron RAF.[132] Two Junkers Ju 290s from FAGr 5 (Fernaufklärungsgruppe) shadowed the convoy while Fw 200s from KG 40 were involved in bombing the convoy from high altitudes. KG 40 committed the He 177 with Hs 293 radio-controlled missiles for the first time. The 4,045 grt Marsa, built in 1928, was left burning, but only one of her 50-man crew was killed. The freighter Delius was damaged, but that was all the 25-strong He 177 force could accomplish. The ships avoided the missiles through rapid manoeuvres and flares.[133] 25 of the 40 Hs 293s failed upon deployment.[134]

In December 1943, Fliegerführer Atlantik fought defensive battles against Operation Stonewall, and air and sea operation to interdict German merchant ships and blockade runners. The Kriegsmarine sent destroyers to meet and escort them to port under air cover. The operation was not immediately successful until 28 December 1943, and the Battle of the Bay of Biscay.[135] A single Fw 200 attempted to sink British warships but was unsuccessful.[135] The battles proved difficult and the Fw 200s vulnerable. November an December saw the loss of valuable crews an aircraft.[136]

Defeat and dissolution: 1944[editar | editar código-fonte]

The long-range aircraft BdU had long since requested was met in the Ju 290, which could carry bombs and guided missiles. The aircraft had limited performance but the crews found it comfortable an straightforward to fly. Proposals were made to increase the number of aircraft from 86 to 174 but this came at the price of reducing Fw 190 production and it was ultimately shelved.[137] On 6 January 1944 Kessler informed Seekriegsleitung (SKL—Maritime Warfare Command) that the 31 December 1943 air raids stemming from the Combined Bomber Offensive had decimated the airfields at Bordeaux–Mérignac Airport, Cognac – Châteaubernard Air Base, Landes De Bussac and Saint-Jean-d'Angély. III./KG 40 was shattered and non-operational for five weeks. All Fw 200s were unavailable for operations. Fliegerführer Atlantik estimated that only five Ju 290s, three Ju 88s and two Bv 222s by 20 January 1944. The cooperation this month, while attempted, produced no success. BdU's war diary was critical of the FuG 200's reliability.[138]

On 10 February 1944 Fliegerführer Atlantik achieved a final success when I./KG 40 sank El Grillo in Seyðisfjörður. [139] The ship was the only one sunk by German aircraft in the Atlantic in 1944.[140] Kessler was dispirited by the state of his unḍer resourceḍ command. He sought an audience with Hitler but failed. Kessler's views were well known in the OKL. Göring was attuned to criticism at the higher levels since Dönitz had lambasted the lack of air support infront of Hitler for some time. Embarrassed by his suborinates complaints, Kessler became another command casualty of Germany's deteriorating military situation.[141] On 7 February 1944, Fliegerführer Atlantik was formally dissolved. The deletion of the command from Luftflotte 3 was kept from Kessler until 28 February.[141]

The feeble forces formerly under Kessler's command were sent to other units. KG 40 was assigned to Fliegerkorps X in March 1944. Fernaufklärungsgruppe 5 followed suite. Each combat unit remained in France until the end of the Normandy Campaign in August 1944 and ensuing withdrawal into Germany. Luftwaffe forces sank just 16 ships in the Atlantic from January 1943 to May 1944. The six of the 15 sunk in 1943 came in July 1943. The total for the year totalled 121, 520 grt. The single ship sunk in 1944, in February, amounted to 7,264 grt.[140]

Commanding officers[editar | editar código-fonte]

  • Generalleutnant Martin Harlinghausen, 31 March 1941 – 5 January 1942
  • Generalmajor Wolfgang von Wild (acting), 30 October 1941 – 5 January 1942
  • General der Flieger Ulrich Kessler, 5 January 1942 – 1 April 1944

References[editar | editar código-fonte]

Citations[editar | editar código-fonte]

  1. a b National Archives 2000, p. 105.
  2. a b c Corum 1997, pp. 78–80.
  3. Ashby 2005, pp. 24–25.
  4. a b Ashby 2005, pp. 28–32.
  5. Korda 2009, p. 10.
  6. Hooton 1997, p. 42.
  7. Lee 1972, p. 76.
  8. a b Ashby 2005, pp. 26–34.
  9. Ashby 2005, p. 34.
  10. Ashby 2005, pp. 35–36.
  11. Corum 1997, pp. 212–123.
  12. Corum 1997, pp. 264–266.
  13. Ashby 2005, pp. 37–40.
  14. Ashby 2005, pp. 41–42.
  15. Ashby 2005, pp. 40–43.
  16. Hooton 1994, pp. 236–237.
  17. Ireland 2003, pp. 44, 67.
  18. Graves, Jenson and Johnson 2003 p. 216.
  19. Isby 2005, p. 125.
  20. Forczyk 2010, p. 25.
  21. Hooton 2007, p. 90.
  22. a b Isby 2005, p. 230.
  23. Hooton 1994, pp. 236-237.
  24. Isby 2005, p. 235.
  25. Isby 2005, p. 109.
  26. Hooton 1997, pp. 42–44.
  27. Isby 2005, pp. 112-113.
  28. Isby 2005, p. 233.
  29. Isby 2005, pp. 127-128.
  30. Isby 2005, pp. 235-236.
  31. Hooton 2010, p. 88.
  32. Hooton 1997, p. 45.
  33. Hooton 1997, p. 37.
  34. Isby 2005, p. 23.
  35. a b Hooton 2010, p. 111.
  36. National Archives 2001, p. 105.
  37. Forczyk 2010, p. 29.
  38. Goss 2016, p. 24.
  39. a b c d e Hooton 2010, p. 112.
  40. a b de Zeng, Stankey & Creek 2007, p. 129.
  41. de Zeng, Stankey & Creek 2007, p. 132.
  42. de Zeng, Stankey & Creek 2007, p. 134.
  43. a b National Archives 2001, p. 106.
  44. a b Goss 2016, p. 27.
  45. Goss 1997, p. 4.
  46. a b Forczyk 2010, p. 30.
  47. Forczyk 2010, pp. 30, 32.
  48. Forczyk 2010, p. 32.
  49. Forczyk 2010, p. 33.
  50. Hooton 1999, p. 46.
  51. Isby 2005, p. 239.
  52. a b Hooton 1999, p. 47.
  53. a b Forczyk 2010, p. 48.
  54. a b Forczyk 2010, p. 49.
  55. Forczyk 2010, p. 28.
  56. a b Rohwer 2005, p. 60.
  57. a b Rohwer 2005, p. 61.
  58. a b c Hooton 1999, p. 48.
  59. Hessler 1989, p. 68.
  60. Forczyk 2010, p. 50.
  61. a b Goss 2016, p. 26.
  62. Rohwer 2005, p. 65.
  63. Forczyk 2010, p. 51.
  64. a b National Archives 2001, p. 107.
  65. Forczyk 2010, p. 52.
  66. Jackson 2002, pp. 50–52.
  67. Isby 2005, p. 244.
  68. Hooton 2010, p. 113.
  69. a b Forczyk 2010, p. 53.
  70. a b Forczyk 2010, p. 59.
  71. Terraine 1989, p. 389.
  72. a b Hooton 1999, p. 49.
  73. National Archives 2000, p. 109.
  74. National Archives 2001, p. 110.
  75. Forczyk 2010, pp. 56–59.
  76. Terraine 1989, pp. 371–372.
  77. a b Hooton 2010, p. 114.
  78. National Archives 2001, pp. 107–109.
  79. Isby 2005, p. 138.
  80. a b Isby 2005, p. 139.
  81. Gannon 1990, p. pp 308, 339.
  82. a b Hooton 1999, p. 53.
  83. Gannon 1990, p. 407.
  84. National Archives 2001, p. 108.
  85. National Archives 2001, pp. 108–109.
  86. National Archives 2001, pp. 108–109, 111.
  87. Hooton 1999, p. 51.
  88. National Archives 2001, p. 112.
  89. Hooton 1999, p. 312.
  90. Gould 2014, p. 5.
  91. National Archives 2001, pp. 112–115.
  92. a b c d e Isby 2005, pp. 272–273.
  93. a b de Zeng, Stankey & Creek 2007, p. 140.
  94. a b c Hooton 1999, p. 55.
  95. Goss 1997, p. 14.
  96. McCue 1990, p. 60.
  97. a b c d e f Hooton 1999, p. 54.
  98. Goss 2016, pp. 45, 64–65.
  99. McCue 1990, pp. 7–10.
  100. McCue 1990, p. 78.
  101. Isby 2005, p. 141.
  102. a b c Goss 2016, p. 48.
  103. Terraine 1989, p. 581.
  104. Terraine 1989, p. 582.
  105. Terraine 1989, p. 583.
  106. Hendrie 2006, pp. 116–117.
  107. a b c Goss 1997, p. 169.
  108. Goss 2016, p. 43.
  109. Goss 1997, pp. 54–56.
  110. Goss 1997, pp. 228–230.
  111. Goss 1997, pp. 231–233.
  112. Hooton 1999, p. 314.
  113. Grove 2019, p. 164.
  114. a b c d e Hooton 1999, p. 56.
  115. Rohwer 2005, p. 241.
  116. Terraine 1989, p. 499.
  117. Terraine 1989, p. 348.
  118. Rohwer 2015, pp. 53–57.
  119. Hooton 1999, pp. 56–57.
  120. a b c Hooton 1999, p. 57.
  121. Hague 2000, p. 18.
  122. Goss 2016, p. 70.
  123. Admiralty 1947, p. 83.
  124. a b Forsyth 2017, p. 72.
  125. Forsyth 2017, pp. 73–74.
  126. Syrett 1994, pp. 230–231.
  127. Syrett 1994, p. 210.
  128. Syrett 1994, pp. 210–211.
  129. Syrett 1994, p. 251.
  130. Syrett 1994, p. 235.
  131. Syrett 1994, pp. 235–236.
  132. Syrett 1994, pp. 237–244.
  133. Forsyth 2017, p. 73–82.
  134. Forsyth 2017, p. 82.
  135. a b Forsyth 2017, pp. 112–113.
  136. Goss 2016, p. 96.
  137. Forsyth 2017, pp. 46, 50, 98.
  138. Forsyth 2017, pp. 119–129.
  139. Rohwer 2005, p. 305.
  140. a b Hooton 1999, p. 68.
  141. a b Forsyth 2017, pp. 133–134.

Bibliography[editar | editar código-fonte]


Erro de citação: Existem etiquetas <ref> para um grupo chamado "nota", mas não foi encontrada nenhuma etiqueta <references group="nota"/> correspondente