Discussão:Afonso, Príncipe de Portugal (1475–1491)

O conteúdo da página não é suportado noutras línguas.
Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.


A acusação aos reis de Espanha é absurda. Por que então eles casariam posteriormente D. Isabel com D. Manuel I rei de Portugal?

Agree. Not only did Isabel marry Manuel I, but their son Miguel de la Paz was declared heir to the throne by the courts of Aragón and Castile. When Isabel married Manuel, infante Juan was still alive. Fernando and Isabel, whose mother was Portuguese, would have preferred a Portuguese king rather than Felipe el Hermoso who tried to claim the throne after the death of infante Juan, even though Isabel, as the firstborn, had more rights than her sister Juana and it was only after Isabel's death, and also after the death of Miguel de la Paz that Juana and Felipe had rights to the throne. Any reliable references for the conspiracy assertions in the article? --Maragm (discussão) 20h51min de 29 de novembro de 2014 (UTC)[responder]
Infante Afonso died in 1491 and at that time, the legitimate heir to the Castilian throne was João, príncipe das Astúrias who died six years later, so the affirmation, that I also removed, that QUeen Isabel and Fernando manouvered to dissolve this marriage, that of Afonso and Isabel, is ridiculous. If they had any fear of a Portuguese infante becoming king of Castile and Aragón, they would not have been so stupid as to have the widow Isabel marry Manuel I and have their son, Miguel de la Paz declared heir to the thrones of Aragón and Castile. And then, again, when Isabel died, approve the marriage of Manuel to her sister María. --Maragm (discussão) 14h26min de 27 de dezembro de 2015 (UTC)[responder]